Monday, July 13, 2009

dallas ignored

show details 4:43 PM (1 hour ago) Reply



I have written to many sites and received no real response,It would seem that someone seriously interested in Dallas, for example, would be helped if they knew where the center of the conspiracy was;new lines of reasoning and cause would appear,and threads would fall into place. This has not to my knowledge happened with the main web sites. I received material from Igor Orlov, a six foot five version, who says he was a second umbrella man and shot JFK in the neck. His handler was Allen Foster Dulles from Berlin, met during the late nineteen forties.The version of Orlov in the Sword and The Shield seems accurate until 1962, then the stories diverge. There was no frame shop for Orlov or his wife, though there was a frame shop. I was there in 1954 while CIA was framing my father,whom Ed Kennedy insists he had murdered in 1958. There are historical inaccuracies in my Orlov story, which he says are to conceal classified information in Russian terms, and yet give clues, such as: he murdered a Guatemalan dictator in the wrong year and with the wrong name. He says Ed Kennedy, Jim Angleton, Allen Dulles and Bill Casey were the CIA representatives in furnishing the mob with sharpshooters. To me, Contract On America seems to contain a large part of the truth, in re Ruby's phone calls over the summer before Kennedy arrived in Dallas. 90 Seconds In Dallas seems to have disappeared from book lists, by Tichenor. It contains Orlov kicking his contact in the eye. That was Dulles, back at Langley though he had been fired. Orlov also says he was the Zodiac killer, and no one has responded to clues. Also, Angleton's pursuit of Karlow reeks of deception and diversion, since the mole was Orlov, not in CIA HQ, but East Berlin. Angleton rejected this because Sasha was his real name and therefore could not have been his code name, acording to Angleton. I realize the Dallas conspiraxcy was probably larger than anyone could trace, considering the autopsy, for instance, and control of the news for thirty years. But Orlov's story to me seems to have no objective contradiction. especially since no one for some reason has ever explained why JFK was holding his neck when he came out from behind the sign in the Zapruder film.